

After a few minutes of being online, Bob has officially ordered his dream sofa! Taking this more perfect image from the website, he does a few more reverse image searches and finds other websites offering the same sofa at cheaper prices. And searching on the internet with keywords like “white L-shaped,” “modern sofa” gives him thousands of results, but not the one he’s looking for.Īlice hears Bob’s frustration and asks, “Why don’t you try reverse image search?” Bob uploads his images on Google and Bing’s Reverse Image Search and quickly spots a similar-looking image on an online shopping website.

So, he takes a few photos from different angles to ask around in local furniture shops, but tough luck: no one knows this particular brand. Asking the office manager doesn’t help either. The brand and model number is not written on the sofa. The bad news is that he doesn’t know where to buy it from. The good news is that he knows what he wants. Then one day, he spots the sofa of his dreams-a unique L-shaped white contemporary sofa in an office reception. He’s flipping endlessly through furniture catalogs and visiting furniture showrooms, but hasn’t yet landed on something he likes. Building a Reverse Image Search Engine: Understanding Embeddingsīob just bought a new home and is looking to fill it up with some fancy modern furniture. The paperwork for the suit goes on to say that Grande earns several hundred dollars for each social media post she makes and, when it comes to endorsements, can receive. The 76-page complaint lays out a case as to why Forever 21 violated Grande’s copyright, suggesting that she is “highly sought after by companies hoping to secure her endorsement”. Grande’s stature” and violated her copyright when it “stole her name, likeness, and other intellectual property to promote their brands for free.” The complaint, which was filed in California federal court this month, alleges that Forever 21 was “unwilling to pay the fair market value for a celebrity of Ms. Despite receiving some push back for recently canceling her 2019 European tour dates, to take care of her mental health, she has drawn a line in the sand about copyright infringement. At least, that is what Ariana Grande is alleging Forever 21 did, with her show-stopping 10 million dollar lawsuit against the company, claiming copyright infringement.Īriana Grande doesn’t mess around when it comes to standing up for her brand. Well, if you’re like the clothing store Forever 21, you think outside the box and use a model who is very similar to a famous celeb. What if you’re a retailer and you can’t afford to pay a big celebrity top dollar, for an exclusive modeling contract with your company.
